Samsung Galaxy A8 Vs Oneplus 5t
Samsung Milky way A8 (2018) vs OnePlus 5T
VS
Here we compared two smartphones: the v.six-inch Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) (with Exynos 7 Octa 7885) that was released on December 19, 2017, confronting the OnePlus 5T, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 and came out one month before. On this page, you volition notice tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the gadgets.
- Differences
- Review
- Specs
- Benchmarks
- Bombardment life
- Camera
- Comments
Cardinal differences
An overview of the chief advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018)
- Waterproof body (IP68 nomenclature)
- Delivers 40% higher acme brightness (589 against 420 nits)
- Expandable storage via MicroSD carte du jour up to 256GB
- 10% higher pixel density (441 vs 402 PPI)
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
Reasons to consider the OnePlus 5T
- 85% amend functioning in AnTuTu Criterion (320K versus 173K)
- Has a 0.41 inch larger screen size
- Comes with 300 mAh larger battery capacity: 3300 vs 3000 mAh
- Uses a faster type of retentiveness: LPDDR4X 1866 MHz
- Ability to record video in 4K resolution
- More than free energy-efficient CPU – Snapdragon 835
- More recent Os version: Android 10 versus nine
- Slow-motion recording at 120FPS
- Faster storage type - UFS two.i versus eMMC 5.1
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Performance
CPU/GPU performance in apps and games
Bombardment
Battery life, charging type and speed
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
NanoReview score
Final comparison evaluation
Value for money
You can enter your local price of these phones (in USD or any other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which 1 has a better value for money.
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Display
Type | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
Size | 5.half dozen inches | 6.01 inches |
Resolution | 1080 ten 2220 pixels | 1080 ten 2160 pixels |
Aspect ratio | 18.five:9 | 18:9 |
PPI | 441 ppi | 402 ppi |
Refresh rate | 60 Hz | sixty Hz |
Max rated brightness | 390 nits | 680 nits |
HDR support | No | No |
Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Drinking glass 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass five |
Screen-to-torso ratio | 75.8% | 79.88% |
PWM | 242 Hz | 242 Hz |
Response time | 4.6 ms | 4.8 ms |
Contrast | ∞ Infinity | ∞ Infinity |
Height brightness test (automobile)
Sources: NotebookCheck [three], [4]
Design and build
Height | 149.ii mm (5.87 inches) | 156.1 mm (6.fifteen inches) |
Width | 70.half-dozen mm (2.78 inches) | 75 mm (2.95 inches) |
Thickness | viii.four mm (0.33 inches) | 7.3 mm (0.29 inches) |
Weight | 172 gramm (6.07 oz) | 162 gramm (5.71 oz) |
Waterproof | IP68 | No |
Rear material | Glass | Metal |
Frame cloth | Metal | Metallic |
Colors | Black, Aureate, Blue | White, Black, Gold, Gray, Cerise |
Fingerprint scanner | Yes, rear | Yep, rear |
Performance
Tests of Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) and OnePlus 5T in the benchmarks
Chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 |
Max. clock | 2200 MHz | 2450 MHz |
CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
Compages | - 6 cores at 1.half-dozen GHz: Cortex-A53 - two cores at 2.two GHz: Cortex-A73 | - iv cores at one.ix GHz: Kryo 280 (Cortex-A53) - four cores at ii.45 GHz: Kryo 280 (Cortex-A73) |
Lithography process | 14 nanometers | 10 nanometers |
Graphics | Mali-G71 MP2 | Adreno 540 |
GPU clock | 770 MHz | 710 MHz |
FLOPS | ~29 GFLOPS | ~558 GFLOPS |
RAM size | 4 GB | 6, 8 GB |
Memory blazon | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Retention clock | 1333 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Channels | 2 | 2 |
Storage size | 32, 64 GB | 64, 128 GB |
Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.i |
Retentiveness menu | MicroSD | No |
Retentivity card max. size | Up to 256 GB | - |
Benchmarks
Geekbench five (Single-Cadre)
CPU | 56652 | 90236 |
GPU | 28219 | 108689 |
Memory | 34110 | 53161 |
UX | 55053 | 69203 |
Total score | 173583 | 320709 |
3DMark Wild Life Performance
Stability | - | 81% |
Graphics test | - | 7 FPS |
Graphics score | - | 1173 |
PCMark 3.0 score | - | 7482 |
Sources: 3DMark [3]
Software
Operating organisation | Android 7.1.i (Can exist upgraded to Android 9.0) | Android 7.1.1 (Tin can be upgraded to Android 10) |
ROM | TouchWiz UI | OxygenOS 9.0.4 |
OS size | - | 17 GB |
Battery
Capacity | 3000 mAh | 3300 mAh |
Accuse power | eighteen West | 20 Due west |
Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
Replaceable | No | No |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Reverse charging | No | No |
Fast charging | Yes, Samsung Adaptive Fast Accuse (l% in 30 min) | Yeah, Dash Charge (60% in 30 min) |
Full charging time | 1:35 hr | one:thirteen 60 minutes |
Web browsing | 08:29 hr | 08:13 hr |
Watching video | 13:07 60 minutes | 12:33 hr |
Gaming | 04:32 hr | 04:02 hr |
Standby | 79 60 minutes | 85 hr |
Camera
Specs and camera test of smartphones
Matrix | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Image resolution | 4920 x 3264 | 4616 x 3464 |
Zoom | Digital | Digital |
Flash | LED | Dual LED |
Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
8K video recording | No | No |
4K video recording | No | Upwards to 30FPS |
1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Upwardly to 60FPS |
Boring movement | No | 120 FPS (720p) |
Lenses | one (sixteen MP) | 2 (16 MP + 20 MP) |
Wide (master) lens | - sixteen MP - Discontinuity: f/1.7 - Focal length: 26 mm - Pixel size: ane.12 micron - Sensor: ane/ii.8", Samsung S5K2P6SX (ISOCELL CMOS) - Phase autofocus | - 16 MP - Aperture: f/1.7 - Focal length: 27 mm - Pixel size: 1.12 micron - Sensor: 1/two.8", Sony IMX398 (Exmor-RS CMOS) - Stage autofocus |
Camera features | - | - Bokeh manner - Pro fashion |
Megapixels | sixteen megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Prototype resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 10 3456 |
Discontinuity | f/one.9 | f/ii.0 |
Focal length | 27 mm | 20 mm |
Pixel size | 1 microns | ane microns |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI CMOS |
Sensor size | one/3.i" | 1/3.ane" |
Video resolution | 1080p (Full Hard disk drive) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
DxOMark camera tests
Connectivity
Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi five (802.11 a/b/one thousand/n/air-conditioning) | Wi-Fi five (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
Wi-Fi features | - Dual Ring - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
Bluetooth version | five | 5 |
Bluetooth features | PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP | LE, A2DP |
USB type | USB Blazon-C | USB Type-C |
USB version | 2 | 2 |
USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage manner - OTG | - Charging - USB-Storage style - OTG |
GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
NFC* | Yes | Yes |
Infrared port | No | No |
Number of SIM* | ii | 2 |
Blazon of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
Multi SIM fashion | Standby | Standby |
eSIM back up* | No | No |
Hybrid slot | No | No |
LTE Cat* | 11 | 12 |
5G back up | No | No |
Sound
Speakers | Mono | Mono |
Headphone sound jack | Yes | Yes |
FM radio | Aye | No |
Dolby Atmos | Yeah | No |
Other
Category | Mid-range | Flagship |
Announced | December 2017 | November 2017 |
Release appointment | Jan 2018 | November 2017 |
SAR (head) | 0.241 Westward/kg | 1.68 W/kg |
SAR (body) | ane.25 West/kg | 1.71 Due west/kg |
Sensors | - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint | - Hall-effect sensor - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network back up, and another specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the performance and software are more important to you, then choose the OnePlus 5T. But if the brandish, design, and sound are more than of a priority – get for the Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018).
Cast your vote
So, which phone would you choose?
Total votes: < 1
Related comparisons
You can share your opinion or inquire a question in the comments below
Samsung Galaxy A8 Vs Oneplus 5t,
Source: https://nanoreview.net/en/phone-compare/samsung-galaxy-a8-2018-vs-oneplus-5t
Posted by: kerstendees1956.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Samsung Galaxy A8 Vs Oneplus 5t"
Post a Comment